🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," said a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization established by the family of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a leading peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely unfolding at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills demanding parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various individuals to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global discussion unfolds, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.